Submission Guidelines
Article Types
-
Original Research
-
Literature Reviews and Meta-analyses
-
Policy Analysis & Commentary
-
Undergraduate or Masters Theses or Capstone Project
-
Public Health Expert Interviews
Original Research
-
Original Research papers should seek to address specific questions regarding health disparities, global health, or any other discipline under the greater umbrella of public health.
-
Original Research papers should contain a traditional structure including an abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, conclusion, references, and tables and figures.
-
Original Research papers should contain a maximum of 4,000 words, not including acknowledgments, references, or figures
Literature Reviews and Meta-analysis
-
Literature Reviews and Meta-analyses should utilize existing data to answer or explore new questions within the field of public health
-
Meta-analyses should clearly describe statistical methods and measures used
-
Literature Reviews and Meta-Analyses should contain a maximum of 4,000 words, not including acknowledgments, references, or figures
Undergraduate or Masters Theses or Capstone Projects
-
Completed or adapted versions of undergraduate honors theses or Master’s-level capstone projects are eligible for submission.
-
Submissions should be condensed into a journal-article format rather than a full thesis.
-
Faculty mentorship and approval are strongly encouraged
-
Theses and Capstone Project article should contain a maximum of 7,500 words not including acknowledgments, references, or figures
Public Health Expert Interviews
-
Interviews with public health experts should focus on their specific research interests, their views of current issues in public health, or other relevant questions
-
Public health experts should have a Ph.D. or an M.D./D.O. or equivalent degree with significant work in public health
-
Submissions should be written in a Q&A or narrative format
-
Interviews should contain a maximum of 2,000 words
Policy Analysis & Commentary
-
Submissions may include policy briefs, ethical analyses, or evidence-based opinion pieces
-
Manuscripts should present a clear argument supported by empirical evidence or scholarly literature
-
Suggested structure includes an Introduction, Background, Analysis, Discussion, and Conclusion
-
Policy analyses may be diagnostic or evaluatory and should apply a Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) framework and identify relevant stakeholders.
-
Diagnostic analyses:
-
Define and characterize the public health problem (SDOH-based)
-
Identify stakeholders
-
Evaluate policy options based on feasibility, public health impact, and fiscal/legal/political viability
-
Compare alternative outcomes, including a “do-nothing” scenario
-
Address unintended consequences
-
Propose implementation, KPIs, and policy adjustment plans
-
-
Evaluatory analyses:
-
Define the problem (SDOH-based) and policy of interest
-
Identify stakeholders
-
Review relevant literature and global evidence
-
Grade the policy (1–5) on effectiveness, equity, political support, cost-benefit, and public buy-in
-
Provide recommendations and conclusions
-
-
Stakeholders may include experts, community partners, community members, and local decision-makers.
-
Policy and Commentary articles should contain a maximum of 3,000 words not including acknowledgments, references, or figures